Music Blogs

There's More To The Song Than Meets The Ear

Posted Thu Nov 1, 2007 3:52pm PDT by Jay Babcock in The ARTHUR Blog

"You proved to the world what can happen with a little bit of love and understanding and SOUNDS." - Jimi Hendrix at Woodstock at the peaceful three-day festival's close

Following up the earlier post on the subject, a few more reflections on Radiohead's In Rainbows end run around the existing music industry...

There's a good case to be made that music is humanity's oldest form of communication, its earliest artform. For the tens of thousands of years that homo sap has wandered the planet, always in groups, sitting round campfires every night, music has been present only when three things were present: performer, listener and peace. Outside of the solitary performer-listener--call him the Lone Whistler--music was necessarily a social, peaceful activity--an occasional but integral part of the sound of being alive in the world. It was something that even seemed trans-human, in that animals made sounds that sounded like music to us (birdsongs, doghowl choirs, etc). The songs could be old, or new, or both, but they only existed in one moment: the here-and-now. They grounded us with each other.

If this sounds too abstract, try this thought experiment. Imagine if machinery suddenly stopped working--the grid goes down, batteries don't work, oil's stopped up. We're back in the Paleolithic. Where and when would you hear music? You'd only hear it in-person. That is the way we humans have successfully lived for 99% of our history on this planet. It turns out you really did have to be there. You wouldn't encounter music otherwise.

Furthermore, in this scenario, which likely obtained across the 100,000 years of human history, and which is still present in some surviving first people cultures on Earth, music accompanied times of peace. Yes, there is music that accompanies combat or suffering--warsongs, field labor songs--but Music seems to be a quality of human culture that flows most and fullest and most pleasantly in peacefulness--in that existential moment of fundamental non-aggression between performer and listener. We break bread together, we smoke together, we reason together, we goof together, and we make music together.

For all of this time, then, there was more to music than meets the ear. But the communication technology manufacturing revolution of the last 150 years has changed everything. The transmission of sound across time (through recording playback machines) and space (through electric communication--telephone, radio, internet, etc.) is the new norm. It is the way music is experienced by most humans, most of the time. And with it comes a detachment from the here-and-now, a detachment from the act of music's production itself, and of course some kind of detachment from other humans altogether. Music used to shorten the space between us. Today, most of the time, for most of us, music actually widens the gap.

Music is no longer an emblem of peace, something we pretty much only encounter when in peace with others. We now encounter it everywhere, all the time, as a disembodied fact. This lessens our incentive to be in peace with each other, and in peace with our environment--music is no longer one of the sweet rewards for having found a way to get along with each other. In food terms, we've traded organic sweets for industrial sugar. The result is the same: cavities. Society rots as we enjoy a second-hand lifestyle of cheap highs.

The coming end of the global music industry's physical infrastructure, hastened by Radiohead's recent selfish action, which will only make it even harder for our best musicians to do their work, needs to be seen in this moral, or at least historical, context. Does music as free, disembodied computer file close the gap between humans--and between humans and their environment--or does it further widen it? Does it bring Music any closer to the temple of peace? Doubtful. The so-called digital revolution is not just killing the music industry--it's killing Music herself, by reducing and degrading our experiences with her, by removing almost all of the social, physical and analog aspects of music that have been so historically beneficial to human well-being. Her grace lost, her gifts abused and cheapened, Music does survive, here and there. But you're less likely than ever to encounter her essence. What have we lost? Well, you'll know when you feel it--and I bet you won't be alone with your iPod when it happens.

Jay Babcock is editor/owner of Arthur Magazine.

5 Comments

1. Jay -
Good article on this subject in today's NYTimes - "The Dance of Evolution, or How Art Got Its Start" by Natalie Angier available online at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/27/science/27angi.html

2. Jay -
Finally figured out what Radiohead should've done: release the new album on vinyl only through their own label. Imagine the implications and positive repercussions that would have had...

3. fujichia -
does paying for music bring us closer to the temple of peace? doubtful. Does music on a physical disc made of a nonrenewable resource (which many are unable to play) close the gap between humans--and between humans and their environment--or does it further widen it?

also, isn't the analog digital debate over? didn't we decide that it doesn't matter?

4. Jay -
6 - Of course the piece is negative. We're in a period of music devolving, and this isn't good in a Devo way. The mp3 is worse sound than the cd, which is worse sound than vinyl, which is worse sound than live. As for people enjoying live music, would that that were the case. Ticket prices are prohibitively expensive -- even your precious Radiohead are now charging 42 pounds sterling for the privilege of being in the same arena as them while Thom mewls. Meanwhile there are almost no opportunities for young, quality bands to play to significant all-ages audiences in major cities in the UK or the USA. Add in that radio, tv, internet blogs and what's left of the press follow around the same ol' same ol' and yeah, things are looking/sounding particularly dire.
regarding "peace": you need to read the piece more carefully. it doesn't have to do with peacetime or wartime, it has to do with peace-in-the-moment. i'm not sure how i can be any clearer here.

5. Yahoo! Music User -
Music should be made for the sake of music,not money.That's what a job is for.Maybe people will have to make music for the right reasons now.Hopefully when the music industry croaks,douchebags like john mayer will go with it!
Leave Your Comment
You must sign in to leave a comment
Select a Blog Posts
And The Winner Is...
by Chris Willman
26
As Heard On...
by Rebecca Harper, Hulu
46
Chart Watch
by Paul Grein
140
Framed
by John Kordosh
118
GetBack
by Shawn Amos
330
Hip-Hop Media Training
by Billy Johnson, Jr.
217
List Of The Day
by Rob O'Connor
331
Maximum Performance
by Billy Johnson, Jr.
166
Musictoob
by Andy Pemberton
180
New This Week
by Dave DiMartino
122
Reality Rocks
by Lyndsey Parker
570
Rock's Backpages
by Philip Norman (1970)
191
Stop The Presses!
by Us Magazine
85
That's Really Week
by Lyndsey Parker
124
The Blender Burner
by Blender Magazine
27
The MOJO Blog
by Bill DeMain
88
The NME Blog
by Luke Lewis
48
The Spin Blog
by David Marchese
77
The Y! Music Playlist Blog
by Robert of the Radish
511
Video Ga Ga
by Lyndsey Parker
70
Viva NashVegas
by Wendy Geller
56

Jackson's doctor returns to work at Houston clinic

AP
Mon Nov 23, 2009 2:16pm PST

AP - Michael Jackson's doctor returned to work at his Houston medical clinic on Monday for the first time since the pop star's death. Dr. Conrad Murray arrived at the Armstrong Medical Clinic and was greeted by a coupl… More »

More Music News