Music Blogs

Who Cares What Musicians Think About Politics? They're Not Experts, They're Artists--Which Is Exactly Why We Should Listen.

Posted Tue Oct 7, 2008 4:11pm PDT by Jay Babcock in The ARTHUR Blog

Last week I got a call from Randy Randall, guitarist for Los Angeles rock duo No Age, who are currently on the Sub Pop record label. Randy was flustered, talking a mile-a-minute, about what had just gone down. The band had just finished performing a song for some sort of Craig Ferguson/CBS TV thing that was to be broadcast October 27--just over a week before the presidential election. Cameras were about to roll when suddently they were told by an on-set CBS underling that something needed to go: Randy's Obama t-shirt.

This wasn't because CBS wanted No Age to go topless. They're keeping that for the spring break special. No, this was because, the CBS person said, the Obama shirt was on-air editorializing--a possible violation of some FCC edict which this person claimed called for equal time to be given to opposing political viewpoints.

One problem: the last remnant of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" was repealed in 1987; the repeal was upheld by court ruling in 1989.

Since then, corrollary rules of the Fairness Doctrine--the "personal attack" rule and the "political editorial" rule--have also been struck down in the courts, with the last court ruling (and subsequent FCC order) coming in 2000.

In short, there is no fairness rule. Randy's Obama shirt was perfectly broadcastable under every existing law.

But neither No Age nor their people at Sub Pop were aware of the Fairness Doctrine's long-ago demise, and took CBS at their word.

After much deliberation, Randy put on another shirt, which said "Free Health Care," the band played, and the show will, apparently, air.

Some of the slower folks out there may rejoin with, Well who the heck cares what rock musicians think about the election? They should just shut up and play their songs. Leave politics to the experts! On with the doggone show!

What experts are these people talking about? Experts on public policy like the Republican vice presidential candidate? Maybe Bill O'Reilly? Tom Friedman? Rush Limbaugh? Katie Couric? Whoopi Goldberg? All the other nattering goofheads on CBS, ABC, NBC, Fox, CNN and PBS--all of which are underwritten by corporate America, wealthy advertisers, upper-class endowments and the government itself?

Please.

The political situation in this country--heck, on this planet--is far too serious to leave it to these so-called experts, useful idiots and outright bought-and-paid-for whores to debate on our public airwaves.

What we need are other voices, the voices that humanity has always listened to in times of trouble: the voices of the visionaries, the poets, the authors, the ones with a longer view and a deeper sense of what's at stake, who can tell us more about what's going on and why, and perhaps bring us new metaphors, new ways of thinking, new ways of seeing, the situation we face. This country desperately needs to better understand what is happening to itself, and to imagine a better future. Well, artists work with imagination and observation - that is their field. It's long past time we let them back in to the discussion. And it's time to listen to what they're saying--and yes, to look at what they're wearing, too. Time is running out.

Jay Babcock is editor and publisher of Arthur, the free all ages counterculture magazine.

24 Comments

21. James K. -
boo hoo, buncha ignorant music-industry pansies... how could they have believed this? next time, stay at the front of the bus, so to speak. grow some balls. or just ask yourself the following question: what would Lemmy do? jeez. i've yet to hear the music but already figure that there's little chance it "rocks"...

22. Stan -
From Stan (the S-One-W) Weckl:

Mr. Babcock's right. These same media conglomerates that fought to eradicate the Fairness Doctrine are now suddenly concerned with the sanctity of its ghost?! That's some hornswoggle pettifoggery.

J., good to see you on Yahoo now. Great way to ramp up brand awareness and penetrate new markets. May of the knuckleheads and dimwits who lurk (and troll) these parts could use the civilizing influence of Arthur. Though, I did notice a "Nurse with Wound" reference in those debauched comments. I had a secretary who had dated them for a spell, before the lipsynching controversy.

Also, I hear you're in NYC now. You ever make it up to the Upper East (represent!)?

23. Teetop -
Putting this content on Yahoo, where they attached this message board to it, reminds me of an old saying, something to do with pearls and swine.

24. Yahoo! Music User -
nit-picking rules.
Page:  1 | 2 
Leave Your Comment
You must sign in to leave a comment
Select a Blog Posts
And The Winner Is...
by Paul Grein
27
As Heard On...
by Rebecca Harper, Hulu
46
Chart Watch
by Paul Grein
142
Framed
by John Kordosh
120
GetBack
by Shawn Amos
334
Hip-Hop Media Training
by Billy Johnson, Jr.
222
List Of The Day
by Rob O'Connor
332
Maximum Performance
by Lyndsey Parker
167
Musictoob
by Justin Mathews
185
New This Week
by Dave DiMartino
124
Reality Rocks
by Lyndsey Parker
585
Rock's Backpages
by Philip Norman (1970)
191
Stop The Presses!
by Us Magazine
85
That's Really Week
by Lyndsey Parker
125
The Blender Burner
by Blender Magazine
27
The MOJO Blog
by Steven Jelbert
89
The NME Blog
by Luke Lewis
49
The Spin Blog
by David Marchese
78
The Y! Music Playlist Blog
by Robert of the Radish
516
Video Ga Ga
by Lyndsey Parker
72
Viva NashVegas
by Wendy Geller
59

Defamation lawsuit against Dixie Chicks dismissed

AP
Wed Dec 2, 2009 12:28pm PST

AP - A federal judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed against the Dixie Chicks by the stepfather of one of three 8-year-old boys killed in Arkansas 15 years ago. Terry Hobbs, the stepfather of Stevie Branch, cl… More »

More Music News