Guitar Hero Must Die!
The new generation of music games are sounding a widdly-widdly death knell for rock 'n' roll, argues MOJO's Mick Farren.
Saturation yuletide advertising has finally convinced me
that virtual music games like Guitar Hero and Rock Band, in which participants
attempt to "play" classic metal solos by following flashing light sequences on
guitar-shaped plastic peripherals, pose an even greater threat to the future of
rock 'n' roll than Simon Cowell.
For confirmation that these games are an unpleasant victory for short-attention commercial exploitation, we need look no further than a South Park episode titled "Guitar Queer-o," in which Stan and Kyle become Guitar Hero heroes, and, when Stan's dad attempts to teach the fourth graders to actually play a real guitar, Cartman scathingly responds that "real guitars are for old people."
What's being exploited here is as old as rock 'n' roll itself. Few of us have not, at some time in our lives, or perhaps as recently as this morning, played clandestine air guitar or posed in front of a mirror pretending to be Elvis, Jimi, Joe Strummer, or even Joe Satriani. But the global electronic game corporations who have co-opted this youthful narcissism into a competitive game of manual dexterity, with plastic reproductions of Gibsons and Fenders, are having a negative impact on music's future. OK, so we tolerated Tom Cruise dancing around in his underwear to Bob Seger in Risky Business, but enough is, culturally speaking, enough.
Guitar Hero and Rock Band broaden the perceived gulf between performer and audience by pandering to the most juvenile extremes of rock 'n' roll idol worship. Worse than that, they betray the great populist promise of rock 'n' roll--which has held good from the days of The Shadows--that any garage band with a set of cheap instruments and perfunctory chops can achieve icon status if it gets the breaks and is sufficiently relentless.
Equally unpleasant is the unseemly rush by many of our current guitar "heroes" to lease their music for inclusion. Among the shameless are Aerosmith, Metallica, Motorhead, AC/DC and the Sex Pistols, while The Beatles and the Jimi Hendrix estate are reportedly ready to deal. Whether or not this is more heinous than flogging one's songs for TV commercials is open to debate, but the basic absurdity is underscored by the song "Thunderhorse" by DethKlok--the fictional death metal band from the U.S. TV cartoon show Metalocalypse--being incorporated in Guitar Hero II.
At a time when musical education in schools has become a cause célèbre, the promotion of video games that offer nothing more than a closed loop of virtual experience, devoid of creativity, does nothing to help. A spokesman for the game makers has claimed that they teach "sensitivity to rhythm, as well as develop the dexterity and independent hand usage necessary to play the instrument," but this seems disingenuous when the games do nothing to impart the real fundamentals of music.
And just to add injury to insult, an outfit called Mad Catz in San Diego, California will retrofit a perfectly good Fender Stratocaster, replacing strings, pickups and fretboard with the input controls for Rock Band.
Is nothing sacred?
Commune with fellow music maniacs at MOJO4music.com. Mick Farren blogs at Doc40.blogspot.com.


Sure, I also get annoyed when some kid says he can play "guitar" because he can play "One" on expert, but the majority of people that play the game know that there is a difference between playing real guitar and playing Guitar Hero, and that just because you can do one has no bearing on the ability to do the other (except maybe a little dexterity training). I can't play guitar at all, but I'm great at guitar hero. Do I consider myself a guitar player? Of course not. But I like to be able to rock out to my favorite songs. When people air guitar, are they hitting the same notes as the guitarist in the song? No, but it allows you to get more into the song and enjoy it more. So whats the problem with guitar hero?
I think most of this argument springs from the "I heard it first" mentality, and all the people that were fans of these bands before the game got popular are resenting the new following, arguing they aren't true fans. Are we so selfish that we don't like someone for liking the same things as us? If someone says "I'm a huge metallica fan" becuase they played "One" on guitar hero, why does it make someone angry who grew up listening to metallica and has been to 10 concerts? Sure they might not be as "active" as a fan as you, but who cares? Can't you just be happy that the band is spreading in popularity and more people can appreciate what you already do? A comment on the first page says "Real music fans like music before they even listen to it." Now, I know this makes absolutely NO sense grammatically, but I think that he's just saying that "real fans like music before it gets popular." Well I disagree, why is it so bad that if someone plays "Hold On Loosely" on GH 80s and says he's a .38 Special fan? That will probably encourage them to go out and find more songs from .38 Special and listen to and appreciate more good music from a great band. Get off your high horses and lose that "I'm a better fan because I liked it first" mentality, and just appreciate the fact that more people are enjoying the same music as you. It's just a game, and all it's doing is bringing more popularity to rock n roll, how is that "killing" it?
The argument about kids not gettin out and being active is a whole other situation, and I do think that more kids are spending too much time inside playing (myself included) but that has nothing to do with the argument made by the author, and should not be harped on by the comments.
Why do you think Gibson and Fender drop so much money to get their product advertised on the game? Its because the kids come to see these brands as cool and when they pick out a real guitar which brand do you think they'll crave?
Its a game and let it be. People get to hear songs from artists that they normally would not have heard giving these artists big breaks. So while you may strike a point once or twice in your rant but please look a little deeper before making conclusions.
Either that or crappy emo rock bands.
Which you probably dont, if you do she more than probably the man of the house.